Re: Tibetan Ewts variant proposal (and related questions)

Hi All,

> This is a good point. It's perhaps worth noting that we have not 
> registered a new subtag for a transliteration scheme (excluding
> phonetic alphabets) since 2011, when the T extension came into
> existence.

So, is it the end of the discussion and is the final decision "we don't
register transliteration schemes"?

Thank you,
-- 
Elie