Re: Tibetan Ewts variant proposal (and related questions)
"Doug Ewell" <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Mar 2018 07:47:54 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20180313074754.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.ca82af08e0.wbe@email03.godaddy.com> |
Michael Everson replied to Élie Roux: >> First, a subjective argument you can ignore: I find "bo-extwylie" >> very straightforward to understand even for neophytes; while I find >> "bo-t-m0-ewts" much more arcane, even for me. >> > I tend to agree. Do we have any working criteria to decide when to direct a request for a transliteration subtag to CLDR and when to encode it directly? -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages