Re: Armenian (was: Re: ISO 639-3 changes, part 3)

Peter Constable wrote:

>> Yes, I was wrong to say that 639-5 codes are not usable.  However,
>> they are certainly not advisable.
>
> Strong agreement. (I think it were better had collection IDs never
> been permitted.)

I suspect that back in the LTRU days, we weren't comfortable with
deprecating the collection subtags that had already made it in via
639-2, nor with grandfathering those few while ignoring the new ones
added in 639-5.
 
--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org