Re: bo: suppress script Tibt

Would adding suppress-script for this solve any actual problems?

> On 23 Mar 2018, at 07:54, Élie Roux <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> The current Registry has:
> 
> %%
> Type: language
> Subtag: bo
> Description: Tibetan
> Added: 2005-10-16
> 
> %%
> Type: language
> Subtag: dz
> Description: Dzongkha
> Added: 2005-10-16
> Suppress-Script: Tibt
> 
> 
> Is there a reason why
> 
> Suppress-Script: Tibt
> 
> is not present in the bo description? What is the process for deciding
> when a Suppress-Script is relevant? What other Scripts is Tibetan
> written in? Does it mean that "bo" is supposed to be ambiguous?
> 
> Thank you,
> -- 
> Elie

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages