Re: A code for standard Zhuang
David Starner <[email protected]> Tue, 03 Apr 2018 19:27:09 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMZ=zj5p_Cce_KC5dBU4ST2uDcPV66_-_joxfF0pg-x1z=WX5w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:51 AM Arthur Reutenauer < [email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I’m also wondering whether using just [za] wouldn’t be both more > sensible and better serve the community. That’s what most other > Wikipedias do, after all: [zh] for Chinese, not [cmn]; [ar] for Arabic, > not [arb], [pt] for Portuguese, not [pt-br] and [pt-pt], etc. Probably. However, that still leaves the question of what the ISO 639-3 code (which, again, the Wikipedia page for Standard Zhuang gives as mis) should be used, even if that's not needed for Wikimedia (and a theoretical and currently unimportant question of whether za.WP and zyb.WP can coexist.) _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages