Re: language variant subtag "pinyin" modification request
Hugh Paterson <[email protected]> Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:45:23 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAB0NEmzmuDP0FaKqjhUr6-zkWzjFc+hTYu2ee4VqFQDxOVOOjw@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks for the clarification. On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 3:04 PM Doug Ewell <[email protected]> wrote: > Hugh Paterson wrote: > > > I'm interested in some clarification on the statement below: > > > >> It also suggests using invalid tags in the Japan section, where it > >> makes the bizarre statement that "BCP 47 makes no difference between > >> '-' and '_'". Be careful when citing this project. > > > > I'm wondering if the source of confusion at the OSM project might be > > CLDR. I notice that the documentation at CLDR for suggested tags > > includes underscores. See the documentation at [1]. > > > > For my own understanding, am I correct to understand that CLDR tags > > are not BCP47 tags? or put another way what is the relationship > > between CLDR tags (approved ones) and BCP47 tags (approved ones). > > > > [1]: > > > http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/latest/supplemental/likely_subtags.html > > CLDR defines its own extensions of the BCP 47 syntax. Here is the > relevant passage from UTS #35, which defines the syntax for identifiers > (and much more) in CLDR: > > > 3.3 BCP 47 Conformance > > > > Unicode language and locale identifiers inherit the design and the > > repertoire of subtags from [BCP47] Language Tags. There are some > > extensions and restrictions made for the use of the Unicode locale > > identifier in CLDR: > > > > [...] > > > > It allows certain syntax for backwards compatibility (not BCP 47- > > compatible): > > > > The "_" character for field separator characters, as well as the "-" > > used in [BCP47] (however, the canonical form is with "-") > > So underscores are not allowed in BCP 47 tags, but they are allowed in > CLDR identifiers. > > As a side note, CLDR "likely subtags" are not necessary the "suggested > tags" for language tagging. As Section 4.3 of UTS #35 notes, the purpose > of these is to indicate the most likely language, script, and/or region > subtag, given one or two of the others. They do not supersede the > general BCP 47 advice to omit needless subtags. > > For example, although likelySubtags.xml defines this: > > <likelySubtag from="ja" to="ja_Jpan_JP"/> > > there is no reason in normal language tagging to use either 'Jpan' or > 'JP' in this tag. It is just telling you what the most likely script and > region subtags for Japanese would be. > > CLDR is an important user of BCP 47, but its syntax and rules are its > own. > > -- > Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org > > -- *Hugh Paterson III *Innovation Analyst *Innovation Development & Experimentation*, *SIL International* *Web*: Contact & CV <http://hughandbecky.us/Hugh-CV/> _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages