Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: language variant subtag "tongyong" addition request (for Chinese langugaes romanization)
"Doug Ewell" <[email protected]> Sun, 30 Dec 2018 20:27:50 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20181230202750.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.1d9ffc7476.wbe@email03.godaddy.com> |
OK. Just to confirm for the record, this overturns the decision made 10 years ago. I will make sure the forms are in order, as soon as Holiday Activities subside. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: language variant subtag "tongyong" addition request (for Chinese langugaes romanization) From: Michael Everson <[email protected]> Date: Sat, December 29, 2018 6:08 pm To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <[email protected]> Hanyu Pinyin is what is referred to by “pinyin”. I think that this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongyong_Pinyin#Comparison_between_Hanyu_Pinyin_and_Tongyong_Pinyin shows enough differences to warrant distinguishing the two. > On 28 Dec 2018, at 17:53, Doug Ewell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Should we review the lengthy discussions that took place here from August to October 2008, and revisited in September 2009, concerning the ‘pinyin’ subtag and whether or not Tongyong was included in its meaning? _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages