Re: Errors in Registry

Piling on: this seems both expedient and necessary. Thanks, Doug!

Thanks,

Addison

From: Ietf-languages [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Davis ??
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2019 10:10 PM
To: Martin Duerst <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; Ewell, Doug <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Errors in Registry

I agree. Nice work, Doug.
{phone}

On Wed, Jan 9, 2019, 04:11 Martin J. Dürst <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
Hello Doug, others,

On 2019/01/09 08:57, Doug Ewell wrote:
> I've done some experimenting recently with an XML version of the
> Language Subtag Registry, which allowed me to build an XSD schema and
> check the Registry much more robustly than would otherwise be possible
> with the record-jar format.
>
> In the process, I've discovered a few cases where the current Registry
> is not compliant with the RFC 5646 definition. We need to examine these
> cases and decide what to do about them.

Many thanks for checking all of this.

> If there is general agreement to make these changes, I'll post forms. I
> do feel it's important to bring the Registry in line with its
> specification.

I support this way of proceeding.

Regards,   Martin.
_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages