Re: Moldovan

Sascha Brawer <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:32:52 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.languages
Message-ID <CABKQ4ET+++3XmGss=XKz81pmmoS2cZ2EWvZeJpcXnRdnBywXSg@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the explanation! There seems to be a list of all entries here:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/lang-subtags-templates/lang-subtags-templates.xhtml

> I wonder sometimes what folks are looking
> for when they look up the registration form years after the change has
> been made. . I still shake my head over the cross-reference, in the
> Wikipedia article on the Romansh language, to the LSR registration form
> for 'rm' that simply added a Suppress-Script. What sort of
> citation-worthy authority on the language does that provide?

For Wikipedia, the point is being able to fact-check claims in articles.
For example, this footnote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sursilvan#cite_note-wikidata-5ed25969116c8c3d94b94a12bbe06f082a068bc3-v3-3
allows to verify that the claimed BCP47 language tag is indeed the one
being mentioned in the article’s infobox.

— Sascha

Am Mo., 11. Feb. 2019 um 18:41 Uhr schrieb Doug Ewell <[email protected]>:

> Sascha's response displayed the URL better than my original response.
> Apologies for the way my phone sometimes formats mail messages.
>
> To explain a bit, registration forms for the Language Subtag Registry
> are transactional; they represent a single action (add or modify) and
> are never "updated."
>
> For example, a subtag 'zzz' could be created, then have its Description
> changed, then be deprecated (this could happen e.g. with lesser-known
> languages added to 639-3). This would result in three separate
> registration forms. The first would be "regform-zzz"; the latter two
> would be "regform-zzz-yyyy-mm-dd" indicating the date of the request or
> approval. We've had more than 40 of these "dated" registrations already.
>
> Registrations that were part of the RFC 4645 or 5645 bulk additions do
> not have registration forms. I wonder sometimes what folks are looking
> for when they look up the registration form years after the change has
> been made. I still shake my head over the cross-reference, in the
> Wikipedia article on the Romansh language, to the LSR registration form
> for 'rm' that simply added a Suppress-Script. What sort of
> citation-worthy authority on the language does that provide?
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Moldovan
> From: Sascha Brawer <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, February 11, 2019 7:04 am
> To: Doug Ewell <[email protected]>
> Cc: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <[email protected]>
>
> Ah, got it; thank you.
>
> Am Mo., 11. Feb. 2019 um 13:30 Uhr schrieb Doug Ewell
> <[email protected]>:
>
>
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/lang-subtags-templates/mo-20081125.txt
>
>

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages