Re: Moldovan
Sascha Brawer <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:32:52 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.languages |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABKQ4ET+++3XmGss=XKz81pmmoS2cZ2EWvZeJpcXnRdnBywXSg@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks for the explanation! There seems to be a list of all entries here: https://www.iana.org/assignments/lang-subtags-templates/lang-subtags-templates.xhtml > I wonder sometimes what folks are looking > for when they look up the registration form years after the change has > been made. . I still shake my head over the cross-reference, in the > Wikipedia article on the Romansh language, to the LSR registration form > for 'rm' that simply added a Suppress-Script. What sort of > citation-worthy authority on the language does that provide? For Wikipedia, the point is being able to fact-check claims in articles. For example, this footnote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sursilvan#cite_note-wikidata-5ed25969116c8c3d94b94a12bbe06f082a068bc3-v3-3 allows to verify that the claimed BCP47 language tag is indeed the one being mentioned in the article’s infobox. — Sascha Am Mo., 11. Feb. 2019 um 18:41 Uhr schrieb Doug Ewell <[email protected]>: > Sascha's response displayed the URL better than my original response. > Apologies for the way my phone sometimes formats mail messages. > > To explain a bit, registration forms for the Language Subtag Registry > are transactional; they represent a single action (add or modify) and > are never "updated." > > For example, a subtag 'zzz' could be created, then have its Description > changed, then be deprecated (this could happen e.g. with lesser-known > languages added to 639-3). This would result in three separate > registration forms. The first would be "regform-zzz"; the latter two > would be "regform-zzz-yyyy-mm-dd" indicating the date of the request or > approval. We've had more than 40 of these "dated" registrations already. > > Registrations that were part of the RFC 4645 or 5645 bulk additions do > not have registration forms. I wonder sometimes what folks are looking > for when they look up the registration form years after the change has > been made. I still shake my head over the cross-reference, in the > Wikipedia article on the Romansh language, to the LSR registration form > for 'rm' that simply added a Suppress-Script. What sort of > citation-worthy authority on the language does that provide? > > -- > Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Moldovan > From: Sascha Brawer <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, February 11, 2019 7:04 am > To: Doug Ewell <[email protected]> > Cc: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <[email protected]> > > Ah, got it; thank you. > > Am Mo., 11. Feb. 2019 um 13:30 Uhr schrieb Doug Ewell > <[email protected]>: > > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/lang-subtags-templates/mo-20081125.txt > > _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages