Re: Revised forms for Bornholmsk

+1

{phone}

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019, 14:08 Doug Ewell <[email protected]> wrote:

> Michael Everson wrote:
>
> > I do not agree. It’s not called *Bornholmian here for instance
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bornholmsk_dialect
> >
> > If I had to anglicize, I’d go for Bornholmish.
>
> I don't think we have any requirement to anglicize artificially.
>
> We wouldn't register "español" or "deutsch" or "dansk" because those
> entities have well-established English names. But Bornholmsk appears to
> be generally known by that name in English-language contexts.
>
> We don't need to make something up, or use something obscure, simply to
> avoid the Danish "-sk" ending. See Section 3.1.5: Description fields
> aren't guaranteed to be in any particular language.
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages