Re: OBSOLETE field (was: schema-08 notes)

Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
>At 06:43 PM 3/25/2005, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>> It seems to belong in [Models] now, but that
>> just says
>>
>>        [ SP "OBSOLETE" ]          ; not active
>>    OBSOLETE indicates this <whatever> is not active;
>>
>> "not active in the subschema" would be more informative.
>
> During AUTH48, I'll ask the RFC Editor to replace the section 4.1
> text:
>    The OBSOLETE field, if present, indicates the element is not active.
> with:
>    The OBSOLETE field, if present, indicates the element is not active
>    in the subschema.  Only active definitions regulate the directory.
>
> and in 4.1.X replace s/not active/not active in the subschema/.

Hm.  Or maybe 'in this subschema', to clarify that it's not any
subschema in any server using this schema element?

> This likely will require explicit AD approval.  Given this is
> a minor clarification, that shouldn't be a problem.

-- 
Hallvard