Re: street (was: more schema-08 notes)
Hallvard B Furuseth <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:20:17 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldapbis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kurt D. Zeilenga writes: > The examples we give, as well as the prose describing the > attribute type, should be consistent with X.520. > > The X.520 example is: "Arnulfstraße 60". > The X.520 description is: > The Street Address attribute type specifies a site for > the local distribution and physical delivery IN a postal > address, i.e. the street name, place, avenue, and the > house number. When used as a component of a directory name, > it identifies the street address at which the named object > is located or with which it is associated in some other > important way. > > Emphasis on IN added. Ouch. Then the descriptions of street in RFC 2256 and [Schema] are quite wrong. As in my example (below), a Street Address a above may be unsuitable for "physical address[es] of the object to which the entry corresponds, such as an address for package delivery", and a separate postalCode attribute may not help. >At 06:56 AM 3/30/2005, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote: >> postalCode, if we used it, would be the postal code of >> the postal address. Usually that is a postbox and the street address >> has another postal code. So street is e.g. "Research Street 3, 0373 >> OSLO" or "Admin. building, Problem street 7, 0313 OSLO" (in Norwegian). >> (...) >> Oslo is big enough that omitting the postal code would not be a good >> idea for package delivery. -- Hallvard