Re: Fwd: Re: draft-ietf-ldapbis-protocol - controls

Jim Sermersheim wrote:

> I don't. What I'm saying is there was a message from Howard which seemed 
> to me to raise these two issues (a and b). Relaxing what "appropriate" 
> means doesn't address either of these issues. Maybe I'm wrong and the 
> only issue raised was that we want "appropriate for the operation" to 
> mean more than specified as appropriate for the operation by the control 
> spec. No response is needed though, I'm too tired of this issue to argue 
> anymore, no one else is concerned. I'll make the change.

Since the Last Call just went out for draft 30, I just wanted to check 
the status of this change.

-- 
   -- Howard Chu
   Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
   http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc
   Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support