Re: authmeth-15: mandatory-to-implement strong authentication
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]> Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:51:49 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldapbis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I believe WG consensus supports changing LDAP's mandatory-to-implement "strong" authentication algorithm from SASL/DIGEST-MD5 to StartTLS+simple(name/password). Hence, I direct the Editor to make appropriate changes to this draft to change the mandatory-to-implement "strong" authentication mechanism to StartTLS+simple(name/password). -- Kurt, LDAPBIS co-chair At 11:52 AM 9/10/2005, Roger Harrison wrote: >There was considerable discussion at the IETF 63 meeting regarding recent research into challenge-response protocols (such as DIGEST-MD5) being vulnerable to off-line dictionary attacks (see <http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/05aug/minutes/sasl.html>http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/05aug/minutes/sasl.html and <http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/05aug/slides/apparea-4/sld1.htm>http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/05aug/slides/apparea-4/sld1.htm ). > >One proposal was to recommend performing challenge-response authentication over TLS-protected connections. If we moved this dirction, then requiring the use of DIGEST-MD5 security layers seems redundant. > >What effect, if any, does this have on our use of DIGEST-MD5 as the mandatory-to-implement strong authentication mechanism for LDAP? > >Roger