Re: SASL Semantics Within LDAP

Hallvard Furuseth writes:
 
> Roger Harrison writes:
> > and it isn't meant to exhaustively enumerate the issues with
> > DIGEST-MD5 semantics relative to LDAP such as the method used to
> > generate a hash value.
> 
> No, I was only suggesting s/will fail/may fail/ at this time.
> Or "can fail".  A long explanation for a short word:-)
 
Perhaps I'm not very imaginative, but how could the authentication
succeed if there isn't a match according to SASL DIGEST-MD5 semantics?
Can you give me at least a possible example? If so, I'll gladly s/will
fail/may fail/. If not, I think I'd prefer to leave it as "will fail."
> 
> -- 
> Hallvard