Re: protocol: Result codes no longer reserved for API

Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
> As LDAPBIS co-chair, I see no need for any WG chair action at
> this late stage (the I-D is approved for publication) to make
> any changes to the I-D based upon your comments.

OK.

> (...)
>> BTW, C.1 also does not note that strongAuthRequired was renamed to
>> strongerAuthRequired.
>
> See C.1.9.

Oops... but it was true in protocol-20, which I had open in another
window:-)

-- 
Hallvard