Re: Fwd: Call for interop proposals
Jaimon Jose <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:20:59 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldapext,gmane.ietf.ldapbis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We do have test suites defined by opengroup which most of the directory vendors follow. Would that be sufficient? or should we define new test suites as part of this exercise? --jaimon Kurt Zeilenga wrote, On 01/11/2008 11:33 AM: > Anyone interest in proposing some LDAP interop testing? > -- Kurt > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Lisa Dusseault <[email protected]> >> Date: January 9, 2008 5:13:17 PM PST >> To: Apps Discuss <[email protected]> >> Cc: Lisa Dusseault's Chairs <[email protected]>, >> [email protected] >> Subject: Call for interop proposals >> List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols >> <discuss.apps.ietf.org> >> >> >> At the Apps area open meeting in Vancouver, Chris & I mentioned the >> possibility of doing a day of interoperability events at the next IETF >> meeting. This would replace a day of Apps area meetings during the >> normal meeting hours and in the normal meeting location. Ideally it >> would allow people to come to the IETF for more than just "their" >> meeting (although we have always hoped they can attend other WG >> meetings as well) and participants may get more benefit and better >> justification for attending. >> >> If we're going to do this, we need proposals: what topic ( IDs, RFCs, >> suites or functionality) will be tested. I don't think interops will >> need a lot of management but volunteer coordinators would be ideal. >> Proposals will need to be followed quickly by some indications of who >> will participate. WG scheduling is already open and we need to tell >> the Secretariat immediately if they need to reserve a day for interops. >> >> Proposals should probably be posted on some relevant subject mailing >> list to quickly generate discussion among potential participants -- >> not everybody reads Apps Discuss. >> >> Thanks, >> Lisa >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Ldapext mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext