Re: Fwd: Call for interop proposals

Jaimon Jose <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:20:59 +0530
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ldapext,gmane.ietf.ldapbis
Message-ID <[email protected]>
We do have  test suites defined by opengroup which most of the directory 
vendors follow.  Would that be sufficient? or should we define new test 
suites as part of this exercise?

--jaimon

Kurt Zeilenga wrote, On 01/11/2008 11:33 AM:
> Anyone interest in proposing some LDAP interop testing?
>     -- Kurt
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Lisa Dusseault <[email protected]>
>> Date: January 9, 2008 5:13:17 PM PST
>> To: Apps Discuss <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Lisa Dusseault's Chairs <[email protected]>, 
>> [email protected]
>> Subject: Call for interop proposals
>> List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols 
>> <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
>>
>>
>> At the Apps area open meeting in Vancouver, Chris & I mentioned the 
>> possibility of doing a day of interoperability events at the next IETF 
>> meeting.  This would replace a day of Apps area meetings during the 
>> normal meeting hours and in the normal meeting location.  Ideally it 
>> would allow people to come to the IETF for more than just "their" 
>> meeting (although we have always hoped they can attend other WG 
>> meetings as well) and participants may get more benefit and better 
>> justification for attending.
>>
>> If we're going to do this, we need proposals: what topic  ( IDs, RFCs, 
>> suites or functionality) will be tested.  I don't think interops will 
>> need a lot of management but volunteer coordinators would be ideal.  
>> Proposals will need to be followed quickly by some indications of who 
>> will participate.  WG scheduling is already open and we need to tell 
>> the Secretariat immediately if they need to reserve a day for interops.
>>
>> Proposals should probably be posted on some relevant subject mailing 
>> list to quickly generate discussion among potential participants -- 
>> not everybody reads Apps Discuss.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lisa
>>
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ldapext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext