Re: Fwd: Call for interop proposals

Michael,

I thought I was on the JNDI interest list but I didn=27t see your message
about JNDI and RFC 4370.  I=27ve been looking at using proxy authz
using JNDI, how does it fall short?  I haven=27t tried it yet but I=27d =
love
to know what you=27ve experienced.

Thanks,
Tom
=20
>>> Michael Str=F6der <michael=40stroeder.com> 01/15/08 11:20 AM >>>=20
Jaimon Jose wrote:
> We do have  test suites defined by opengroup which most of the =
directory=20
> vendors follow.  Would that be sufficient? or should we define new =
test=20
> suites as part of this exercise?

Would be interesting to test some things which have rather draft status
like draft- zeilenga- ldap- relax- 02.txt (together with a user interface)
or non- OpenLDAP syncrepl implementations (RFC 4533) if they exist.

Do the test suites of opengroup also cover proxy authorization? E.g.
JNDI falls short following RFC 4370 and there hasn=27t any response to my
inquiry on the JNDI- INTEREST mailing list. Ah, well...

How about testing over Internet? Less social fun but also less traveling.

Ciao, Michael.



_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext=40ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext