Re: UTF-8 full support in LDIF / LDIF v2

Yves Dorfsman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ldapext
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Michael Ströder wrote:
> Yves Dorfsman wrote:
>> Looking back (way back) at this thread, I am not the only one seeing
>> value here:
>>
> 
> Hmm, I agreed on SASL normalization not being an issue.
> But you skipped my strong disagreement about your LDIF diffing use-case.
> 

I'm sorry, I did not try to put any word in your mouth, all I meant was that 
there is more than just me who see value in having non base64 encoded UTF-8.

I know you disagree with me about diffing, but was under the impression you 
saw value somewhere else.

Sorry for the confusion.

-- 
Yves.
http://www.sollers.ca/

_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.