Re: Status of X.500 based Access Control for LDAP

Steven Legg <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ldapext
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Ersin,

Ersin ER wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> May I please learn the status of X.500 based Access Control for LDAP? Is 
> there anybody working on it, any drafts?

I have three expired drafts relating to X.500 access control for LDAP:

     draft-legg-ldap-admin-03.txt
     draft-legg-ldap-acm-admin-04.txt
     draft-legg-ldap-acm-bac-04.txt

You should still be able to find copies of them online, but if you have
trouble finding them let me know and I'll send them to you. I think the
drafts are complete with respect to X.501 (2005) but I would need to update
the boilerplate before progressing them further. Also, Kurt Zeilenga wanted
me to incorporate the content of RFC 3672 (Subentries in LDAP) into
draft-legg-ldap-admin-xx.txt, but I haven't done that yet.

Regards,
Steven

> 
> At Apache Directory Project we already have a working subsystem which is 
> almost identical to the one in the X.501 (2005) spec. So I (and my 
> colleagues) would like to initiate or contribute to such a work.
> 
> Any pointers or more detailed information are welcome.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- 
> Ersin ER
> http://people.apache.org/~ersiner/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Eersiner/>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ldapext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.