Re: Status of X.500 based Access Control for LDAP
Steven Legg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Ersin,
Ersin ER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> May I please learn the status of X.500 based Access Control for LDAP? Is
> there anybody working on it, any drafts?
I have three expired drafts relating to X.500 access control for LDAP:
draft-legg-ldap-admin-03.txt
draft-legg-ldap-acm-admin-04.txt
draft-legg-ldap-acm-bac-04.txt
You should still be able to find copies of them online, but if you have
trouble finding them let me know and I'll send them to you. I think the
drafts are complete with respect to X.501 (2005) but I would need to update
the boilerplate before progressing them further. Also, Kurt Zeilenga wanted
me to incorporate the content of RFC 3672 (Subentries in LDAP) into
draft-legg-ldap-admin-xx.txt, but I haven't done that yet.
Regards,
Steven
>
> At Apache Directory Project we already have a working subsystem which is
> almost identical to the one in the X.501 (2005) spec. So I (and my
> colleagues) would like to initiate or contribute to such a work.
>
> Any pointers or more detailed information are welcome.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Ersin ER
> http://people.apache.org/~ersiner/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Eersiner/>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ldapext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext