Re: Request for review draft-cal-resource-schema - Schema for representing resources for calendaring and scheduling services

Ciny Joy <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:50:47 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ldapext
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Kurt,
    Thank you so much for the response. I will look into doing the 
registration as described in BCP 64. Wondering if it would be prudent to 
wait for any issues that might come up during reviews before doing that.

Thanks,
Ciny

On 10/24/10 2:36 PM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> LDAPext'ers,
>
> Please review.
>
> Ciny,
>
> Your I-D should contain appropriate registration requests for all the new LDAP descriptors defined in the document, and the registration request submitted for consideration as discussed in BCP 64.
>
> -- Kurt
>
> On Oct 21, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Ciny Joy wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>    A new version of the draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cal-resource-schema-02), describing the schema for representing resources for calendaring and scheduling based on our discussions in Calconnect, has been submitted. This draft includes a mapping of the schema for both vCard and LDAP. We have tried to reuse existing LDAP attributes as much as possible.
>>
>>   I would really appreciate review and feedback by the experts.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ciny
>