Re: Review of draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec-08.txt
Kurt Zeilenga <[email protected]> Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:16:56 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Oct 26, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Sean Turner wrote: > On 10/24/10 4:34 PM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote: > >> mailReceipt spec should discuss IDNA and EAI. > > Wouldn't referring to [SMTP] (RFC 5322) suffice? Personally, I would prefer a bit more precise statement. For instance, is it an <address> or some subset of <address>, like <addr-spec>? But given this is only to be published as Informational, I don't mind too much the lack of precision. > > OLD: > > The 'mailReceipt' attribute contains the provider's email address to which take in charge and virus detection PEC notifications are sent. > > NEW: > > The 'mailReceipt' attribute contains the provider's email address [SMTP] to which take in charge and virus detection PEC notifications are sent. > >> managedDomains spec should discuss IDNA. > > Ditto: > > OLD: > > The 'managedDomains' attribute lists the PEC domains that are handled by the provider. > > NEW: > > The 'managedDomains' attribute lists the PEC domains [SMTP] that are handled by the provider. I rather not use the verb "lists" as an attribute holds a set of values (not a sequence). The placement of PEC seems begs the question "what's a PEC domain?". I think what's actually meant is: The 'managedDomains' attribute holds a set of domains [SMTP] that are handled by a PEC provider. Note that RFC 5322's domain actually allows values such as [127.0.0.1]. It's not clear such values make sense here. > > spt