Re: DBIS - new IETF drafts
Andrew Findlay <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:44:11 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 02:36:45PM +0000, Mark R Bannister wrote: > While a DUA MAY implement any authentication password scheme > supported by the DSA, it MUST support the CRYPT scheme for backwards > compatibility, which is an implementation of the traditional UNIX > crypt algorithm. However, it is RECOMMENDED that a more secure > scheme is used. Is it really necessary for client code to get involved with this at all? > Passwd and group database entries contain encrypted passwords and > SHOULD be transmitted securely when transferred between DSA and DUA > to prevent eavesdropping. A DUA SHOULD NOT allow a user to see any > encrypted passwords except they MAY see the password on their own > posixUserAccount entry in encrypted form. Don't rely on the DUA (client code) to protect data from the user. That's just saying "here is a bit of paper with a secret on the other side; please don't turn it over". The person currently looking at the screen may not be the person who logged in... Andrew -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | From Andrew Findlay, Skills 1st Ltd | | Consultant in large-scale systems, networks, and directory services | | http://www.skills-1st.co.uk/ +44 1628 782565 | -----------------------------------------------------------------------