Re: Revive ldapext WG?

Clément OUDOT <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:51:40 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.ldapext
Message-ID	<CAK_oV490Ck1R21cQje=zaE8+0jbygjaCSUrkM=qSwX74Ynj2Nw@mail.gmail.com>

2014-09-26 14:23 GMT+02:00 Michael Ströder <[email protected]>:

> HI!
>
> AFAICS independent draft submissions can only reach informational or
> experimental status.
>
> But I think it should be possible to reach standard status for some
> important
> drafts (like ppolicy draft as discussed at LDAPcon 2013).
>
> What do you think about it?
> Should IETF WG ldapext should be revived?
>

Hi Michael,

100% agree with you, I think we need to convert some important drafts into
RFC. I am willing to help, as far as I can of course.


Clément.

_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext