Re: Revive ldapext WG?

Charlie <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:35:38 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.ldapext
Message-ID	<CAJb3uA5-JcH-5+eeijZYOtYqJuF2GoUvv01Gq-sW1Dpr3oWiqQ@mail.gmail.com>

Micheal Stroeder schriebt:  Should IETF WG ldapext should be revived?

Yes.

--Charlie Brooks

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Michael Ströder <[email protected]> wrote:
> HI!
>
> AFAICS independent draft submissions can only reach informational or
> experimental status.
>
> But I think it should be possible to reach standard status for some important
> drafts (like ppolicy draft as discussed at LDAPcon 2013).
>
> What do you think about it?
> Should IETF WG ldapext should be revived?
>
> Ciao, Michael.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ldapext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext
>

_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext