Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-stroeder-mailboxrelatedobject-06.txt
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:04:30 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sean Leonard wrote: > On 10/5/2014 2:18 PM, Michael Ströder wrote: >> Sean Leonard wrote: >>> On 9/26/2014 9:08 AM, Michael Ströder wrote: >>>> Michael Ströder wrote: >>>>> Personally I consider PKCS#9 to be seriously flawed. E.g. defining as >>>>> GeneralizedTime is bad design. Yuck! >>>> Should have been: "defining dateOfBirth as GeneralizedTime" >>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> Hi Michael, I just wanted to follow up on this. What exactly is the problem >>> with GeneralizedTime? >> There's no real semantics using a time part for dateOfBirth and matching will >> be incorrect. >> >> Furthermore I'm strongly against arbitrarily using zeroed time in case of >> unknown birth time. > > Well what can I say. We should better discuss that in a followup to your message announcing draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-00.txt. Ciao, Michael. _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 4.2 KB) - not displayed