Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:03:06 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 25/01/2015 20:36, Ludovic Poitou wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > Over the years, there has been a number of documents related to the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) that have been left unfinished or are slowly progressing. > > There are a number of individuals that have interest in re-forming an IETF Working Group around LDAP to finish some of the work and make them on the Standard Track. Howard Chu and I are ready to lead that effort. > > I’d like to poll the audience of this mailing list on the interest of seeing this progressing. I would also like to hear about volunteers to work on those documents, either contributing text or reviewing them carefully. > > Please find below the list of documents that have been considered for the working group to finalise and get published (in no specific order): > > draft-findlay-ldap-groupofentries > draft-stroeder-namedobject > draft-stroeder-hashed-userpassword-values (informational > draft-stroeder-mailboxrelatedobject > RFC2307bis > draft-behera-ldap-password-policy > inetOrgPerson 2.0 > > Ludovic > > -- > Ludovic Poitou > http://ludopoitou.wordpress.com > > Hi Ludovic, The following internet drafts are intended to replace RFC2307 and RFC2307bis. They were first released for review in August 2013, although lack of a working group left them largely unreviewed. I did, however, receive many comments from this mailing list a year ago which I incorporated in later versions: draft-bannister-dbis-mapping draft-bannister-dbis-netgroup draft-bannister-dbis-passwd draft-bannister-dbis-hosts draft-bannister-dbis-devices draft-bannister-dbis-automounter draft-bannister-dbis-custom I have subsequently produced a reference implementation in Python, and we are close to having our first large-scale enterprise deployment of DBIS. See http://dbis.sf.net I would prefer to see RFC2307bis removed from the list to be considered above, and replaced by the DBIS drafts. I am also very happy to volunteer my time to review or contribute further to the other documents you mention. Please let me know. Best regards, Mark Bannister. _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext