Re: empty-groupOfNames-issue

On 12/4/2015 3:17 AM, Michael Str=F6der wrote:
> Especially some vendors should raise their voice which approaches they are
> willing to adopt or not.

I believe that the existing Solaris code (in S11+) will work with minor =

customization with any groupOfNames variant.  You'd just tell it what objec=
t class =

and attribute to use.

Anything with a fundamentally different structure... it'd be tough. The inc=
entive =

to implement a new standard that the customers haven't adopted, that doesn'=
t =

provide much truly new functionality, is pretty low.  (Yes, I know that's a=
 Catch-22.)