RE: WG Last Call Status of Requirements Document

I think that the replacement that Mark is suggesting better reflects the
original intention of Chris and myself. Plus, semantically, it is clearer.

regards,
John

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Mark C Smith
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 6:52 AM
To: Kurt D. Zeilenga
Cc: Christopher Apple; '[email protected]'; John Strassner (E-mail)
Subject: Re: WG Last Call Status of Requirements Document



"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
>
> At 07:34 AM 6/4/2001, Christopher Apple wrote:
> >        S2a. The replication protocol MUST support transfer of data
with
> >           integrity and confidentiality.
> >
> >        S2b. The replication protocol MUST support the ability during
> >             initialization of a replication session for an
authenticated
> >             source and replica to mutually decide to turn off data
> >             integrity and confidentiality within the context of and
for
> >           the duration of that particular replication session.
>
> These two requirements would adequate address my concerns in this area.

I would like to see the phrase "turn off" replaced with "disable."  To
me, "turn off" implies that data integrity and confidentiality is "on"
by default which is not necessarily the case.  Otherwise, I like both of
these requirements.

-Mark