RE: Separate LCUP cookie vs replication - was RE: Comments on LCU P draft - opaque cookie

Christopher Apple <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ldup
Message-ID <[email protected]>
   >-----Original Message-----
   >From: Kurt D. Zeilenga [mailto:[email protected]]
   >Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 12:03 AM
   >To: [email protected]
   >Cc: Christopher Apple; 'Richard Huber'; [email protected];
   >[email protected]
   >Subject: Re: Separate LCUP cookie vs replication - was RE: 
   >Comments on
   >LCUP draft - opaque cookie
   >
   >
   >At 12:55 PM 6/12/2001, John Strassner wrote:
   >>if you agree that the format of the cookie isn't the real 
   >issue, then
   >>let's please separate that into two discussions:
   >>
   >>  1) the format of the cookie
   >>  2) whether LCUP will support replicated environments
   >
   >In the absence of support for replicated environments,
   >is there a reason to specify the format of the cookie?
   >
   >Kurt
   >

See my posting related to interoperability concerns that don't
necessarily have anything to do with a replicated environment:

http://www.imc.org/ietf-ldup/mail-archive/msg01067.html

The general answer to your question is that not specifying
at least one standards-track cookie format means that
LCUP interoperability will only be achieved if a few
implementers decide to cooperate to make it happen. Even
*if* that happens, it may or may not last beyond
version 1.0 of the implementations themselves...

As a WG Co-Chair, that's a situation I can't justify
letting us get into without some very compelling reasons.

So far, I've heard no arguments that I consider compelling
enough to outweigh the risk to interoperability that
an opaque cookie poses.

I am definitely OK with the approach of specifying a high-level
cookie structure of "<OID>-<payload>" in the LCUP spec itself
and dealing with the issue of publishing one or more OIDs with
associated payload syntaxes that are standards track.

This approach is outlined here:

http://www.imc.org/ietf-ldup/mail-archive/msg01079.html


Chris Apple
Program Manager - Directory Services
United Messaging Inc.
<http://www.unitedmessaging.com>
<mailto:[email protected]> 
(V) 610-425-2860
Chris Apple (E-mail).vcf (text/x-vcard, 498 B)
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Apple;Chris
FN:Chris Apple (E-mail)
ORG:UMI
TITLE:Program Manager
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(610) 425-2860
TEL;HOME;VOICE:(215) 873-0850
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(610) 585-4241
TEL;WORK;FAX:(610) 425-6501
ADR;WORK:;;1161 McDermott Drive;West Chester;Pa.;19380;United States of America
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:1161 McDermott Drive=0D=0AWest Chester, Pa. 19380=0D=0AUnited States of Amer=
ica
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[email protected]
REV:20010621T205341Z
END:VCARD
smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, 2.2 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.