RE: Separate LCUP cookie vs replication - was RE: Comments on LCU P draft - opaque cookie
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Well, my concern is that by labeling a value (the cookie) which the client should not care about will lead to interoperability problems as clients will start caring about a label which shouldn't matter. As the value of the cookie matters to the protocol peer which generated it, the label seems quite pointless to me. However, as long as there is language added to the text stating that the label is irrelevant to the clients implementing this specification, I can live with it. Kurt