RE: Separate LCUP cookie vs replication - was RE: Comments on LCU P draft - opaque cookie

"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ldup
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Well, my concern is that by labeling a value (the cookie)
which the client should not care about will lead to
interoperability problems as clients will start caring
about a label which shouldn't matter.  As the value of
the cookie matters to the protocol peer which generated
it, the label seems quite pointless to me.  However, as
long as there is language added to the text stating that
the label is irrelevant to the clients implementing this
specification, I can live with it.

Kurt
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.