Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldup-infomod-03.txt
"Jim Sermersheim" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Regarding:
¡ Made obsolete replicaSubEntry and replicaAgreementSubentry
object classes
¡ Defined replacement object classes replicaSubEntry2 and
replicaAgreementSubentry2
Assuming there are no existing implementations of this draft, do we need to rename these attributes?
In general, I think it would be a good idea to hold off the assignment of OIDs in I-Ds until the draft is ready to be progressed to RFC. This will prevent this scenario from being repeated in the future.
Jim