Re: WG Last Call on URP I-D
Ryan Moats <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I sat down last night and did a pass comparing between URP and the requirements document. Others may want to do this as well, because where I found an acceptable explanation, others may not. What I seemed to miss was the discussion of primitive generation with respect to attribute types, attribute subtypes and attribute options. Specifically there was no clarification - whether attribute subtypes and options were or were not supported. I believe absense of a restriction means they are, but others could read absense of a restriction to mean they are not. - whether or not dsaOperation types could be replicated. Since the requirements draft states this as a MUST NOT (req G10), the lack of a discussion in the primitive generation portion of the document disturbs me. Ryan