Re: Subentries decision - internet draft withdrawn

At 08:17 AM 2001-10-30, Ed Reed wrote:
>1) encourage Kurt to revise the draft to make it "Standards Track"
>instead of "Informational", so we can refer to it;

no problem.

>2) Follow David Chadwick's suggestion that we define the
>replicationAgreementSubentry class as a subclass of the X.500
>subentry, and define a structure rule for it that allows containment
>of the replicationAgreementSubentry class entries by replicaSubentry class
>entries.

no problem.

>3) discourage use of the specificationFilter in the SubtreeSpecification,

I note that specificationFilter seems to a useful in supporting
sparse replication.

Kurt