Re: LDAP/X.500 directories vs. IBM's SecureWAy with a DB2 back-end.

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ldup
Message-ID <[email protected]>

It operates like any other LDAP v3 compliant directory (like iDS) that use
flat db back-ends.  I have not used is to any large extent, but I am very
familiar with Oracle Internet Directory (OID), which uses Oracle RDBMS as a
back end.   The scalability and performance are similar and maybe better on
OID if the backend is properly tuned.

Matt Schwienteck
Security Integration Services
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Houston, Tx
832-444-8168




[email protected]@mail.imc.org on 11/15/2001 11:22:34 AM

Sent by:  [email protected]

To:   "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]>,
      [email protected], Christopher Apple
      <[email protected]>, Rob Byrne - Sun Microsystems
      <[email protected]>, Mark Wahl <[email protected]>,
      [email protected], [email protected], "Roddy A. Sue (E-mail)"
      <[email protected]>, [email protected]
cc:
Subject:  LDAP/X.500 directories vs. IBM's SecureWAy with a DB2 back-end.







Team:

I am curious if anyone in the group as researched a comparison of
LDAP/X.500 directories vs. IBM's SecureWAy with a DB2 back-end.

I wonder if anyone would want to comment on this comparison ?

Dave





----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.