Re: LDAP/X.500 directories vs. IBM's SecureWAy with a DB2 back-end.
"Chris Apple" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This sort of discussion shouldn't be taking place on the LDUP mailing list. Would be better to use the old ASID list if its still up and running. I cannot recall the information for subscribing to it. If someone has that info lying around, please send to me and I will post to the LDUP list in response to this message. We have enough work to discuss that's related to the charter, adopting the ACM work from LDAPEXT, and the recently published I-Ds.... Chris Apple Currently self-employed pondering the meaning of life in Olde City, Philadelphia, PA, US, Earth ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Christopher Apple" <[email protected]>; "Rob Byrne - Sun Microsystems" <[email protected]>; "Mark Wahl" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Roddy A. Sue (E-mail)" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:22 PM Subject: LDAP/X.500 directories vs. IBM's SecureWAy with a DB2 back-end. > > > > > > Team: > > I am curious if anyone in the group as researched a comparison of > LDAP/X.500 directories vs. IBM's SecureWAy with a DB2 back-end. > > I wonder if anyone would want to comment on this comparison ? > > Dave > > >