RE: LDAPv4? (Was: Updating "core" specification)
"John Strassner" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
How about answering my previous questions first? Especially since no where in the charter is this mentioned? John -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Kurt D. Zeilenga Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 4:40 PM To: Chris Apple Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: LDAPv4? (Was: Updating "core" specification) At 02:54 PM 2001-11-16, Chris Apple wrote: >No. But I don't see the value in writing that in...what is >this particular concern based on? Again, I am still trying to figure out what is beyond scope of this working group. Can the previously suggested statement be further narrowed? Say to: This group may extend the LDAPv3 "core" specification as necessary to deliver LDAP Replication. However, updating the LDAPv3 "core" specification is beyond scope of this working group.
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 3 KB) - not displayed