RE: Adding to the LDAP ACM to a WG charter

"Paul Leach" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ldup
Message-ID <4AEE3169443CDD4796CA8A00B02191CD02A879D9@win-msg-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
I want to be clear. I am not suggesting that, in order to allow
multi-vendor replicas, a standard ACM isn't required.

The only question is whether they need to be developed by the same WG,
other whether _this_ WG should focus on what has proven to be a very
difficult problem, and finish it; or whether it should undertake another
very difficult problem that may very well defocus it and delay finishing
the primary one it was set up to solve.

This is not a question of requirements -- it is a question of creating
an efficient engineering process to get things done. I believe that
history has shown conclusively that trying to solve too many hard
problems simultaneously leads to none of them getting done.

Paul
smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, 9.8 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.