Re: Adding to the LDAP ACM to a WG charter

"Bruce Greenblatt" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ldup
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I guess that if the message had included a subject, that would have been
helpful...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Greenblatt 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:01 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: 
> 
> 
> Paul Leach wrote...
> 
> > I vote for starting another WG on ACM, or letting individuals do it.
> And
> > note that WGs can technically review things even if individuals
> propose
> > them.
> > 
> > Paul
> 
> I'm arguably a little late into the thread.  I mostly agree 
> with Paul, except that I would like to see it done as a BOF.  
> If the work can't be completed in the next two meetings, then 
> there isn't much point. If the current model is pretty much 
> on target, then it should only take a little more work.  If 
> the current model is way off target, then it will never get 
> finished.  So, I would prefer that LDAP ACM not be added to 
> LDUP, and instead it should be considered by a separate WG or 
> BOF session.
> 
> Bruce
> 
>  
>  
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.