Re: Adding to the LDAP ACM to a WG charter
"Bruce Greenblatt" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I guess that if the message had included a subject, that would have been helpful... > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Greenblatt > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:01 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: > > > Paul Leach wrote... > > > I vote for starting another WG on ACM, or letting individuals do it. > And > > note that WGs can technically review things even if individuals > propose > > them. > > > > Paul > > I'm arguably a little late into the thread. I mostly agree > with Paul, except that I would like to see it done as a BOF. > If the work can't be completed in the next two meetings, then > there isn't much point. If the current model is pretty much > on target, then it should only take a little more work. If > the current model is way off target, then it will never get > finished. So, I would prefer that LDAP ACM not be added to > LDUP, and instead it should be considered by a separate WG or > BOF session. > > Bruce > > > >