G9/G10 (Was: Coverage matrix..)

"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ldup
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At 06:23 PM 2001-11-21, Ed Reed wrote:
>For better or worse, here is my take on how the current Model document addresses the current Requirements document requirements.
>
>I've highlighted comments for requirements not addressed or explicitly broken, in a bold type font.

I'll comment only on the two which might be viewed as suggesting
changes to the requirements I-D.

G9.1 N/A 

I concur.


G10.  Note that this REQUIRES that changes to RootDSE information be
maintained OUTSIDE of LDUP, either directly via Management Operations,
or as side effects of those Management Operations.

Well, I think it's a matter of properly specify the relationship
between DSA-specific information in the root DSE and replication
policy/state information held elsewhere in non-DSA specific
attributes.

For example, namingContexts is maintained on a DSA-specific basis
but is derived from non-DSA-specific information held elsewhere
in the DIT.  I would think that any replication-specific attribute
added to the root DSE would be DSA-specific but, as needed,
derived from non-DSA-specific information held elsewhere in the
DIT.

I see the G10 as being a very appropriate requirement.  It requires
LDUP not change the meaning of DSA specific.

Kurt
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.