RE: naming contexts

"Steven Legg" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ldup
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Kurt,

> RFC 2256, 5.2.1. namingContexts
>    The values of this attribute correspond to naming contexts
>    which this server masters or shadows. 
> 
> I should note that the next sentence could be taken to
> mean that a LDAP server mastering no entries may have
> no namingContexts attribute in the root DSE.
>    If the server does not master any information
>    (e.g. it is an LDAP gateway to a public X.500 directory) 
>    this attribute will be absent.
> 
> Should s/master/hold/ to be consistent with preceeding line
> and RFC 2251:
>    - namingContexts: naming contexts held in the server. 
> Naming contexts
>      are defined in section 17 of X.501 [6].
> 
> Please note that verb "hold" (or variant) when applied to an
> entry (or context), unless qualified, implies the server
> contains either a master or shadow copy.

Hmmm. I took "hold" to mean only a master. We should explicitly
spell out that we mean both naming contexts mastered by the server and
naming contexts shadowed by the server.

Regards,
Steven
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.