RE: naming contexts
"Steven Legg" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kurt, > RFC 2256, 5.2.1. namingContexts > The values of this attribute correspond to naming contexts > which this server masters or shadows. > > I should note that the next sentence could be taken to > mean that a LDAP server mastering no entries may have > no namingContexts attribute in the root DSE. > If the server does not master any information > (e.g. it is an LDAP gateway to a public X.500 directory) > this attribute will be absent. > > Should s/master/hold/ to be consistent with preceeding line > and RFC 2251: > - namingContexts: naming contexts held in the server. > Naming contexts > are defined in section 17 of X.501 [6]. > > Please note that verb "hold" (or variant) when applied to an > entry (or context), unless qualified, implies the server > contains either a master or shadow copy. Hmmm. I took "hold" to mean only a master. We should explicitly spell out that we mean both naming contexts mastered by the server and naming contexts shadowed by the server. Regards, Steven