RE: LDAP ACM in security considerations (RE: I-D ACTION:draft-iet f-ldup-replica-req-11.txt)

"John McMeeking" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ldup
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Tim Hahn and I decided that "Yes, we love this text" ;-).

John  McMeeking
OS/400 Directory Services
(507)253-4596 (T/L) 553-4596



                                                                                                                                    
                      John Strassner                                                                                                
                      <John.                      To:       "'Kurt D. Zeilenga'" <[email protected]>, [email protected] 
                      Strassner@intelliden        cc:       [email protected]                                                       
                      .com>                       Subject:  RE: LDAP ACM in security considerations (RE: I-D ACTION:draft-iet       
                      Sent by: owner-ietf-         f-ldup-replica-req-11.txt)                                                       
                      [email protected]                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                    
                      03/11/2002 01:36 PM                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                    



Thanks Kurt for the revised text.
Replica Requirements authors, could you please talk amongst yourselves ;-)
and reply with a united "Yes, we love this text" or "No, we don't" please?


LDUPers, could you also please think about the suggested text and weigh in
with your votes please?


regards,
John Strassner
co-chair, LDUP


-----Original Message-----
From: Kurt D. Zeilenga [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LDAP ACM in security considerations (RE: I-D ACTION:draft-
ietf-ldup-replica-req-11.txt)





[revised to fix typos]


As noted in previous discussions, the access control model
is only one of the security models which impacts the
replication.  To address this, I suggest the security
consideration section be replaced with:


  This document includes security requirements (listed in
  section 4.8 above) for the replication model and protocol. As
  noted in Section 3, interoperability may be impacted when
  replicating among servers that implement non-standard
  extensions to basic LDAP semantics. Security- related and
  general LDAP interoperability will be significantly impacted
  by the degree of consistency with which implementations
  support existing and future standards detailing LDAP security
  models, such as a future standard LDAP access control model.


Other future standard security models could be listed as
well, but one example is sufficient.


Kurt
graycol.gif (image/gif, 105 B) - not displayed
ecblank.gif (image/gif, 45 B) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.