Re: LCUP and PSearch on Sync-And-Persist
Mircea Pana <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Organization | Metasolv Software |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> That necessarily means server implementors will have to sort the entries > into two groups. I could forsee that many clients may > not care to know when they are "in sync" in a syncAndPersist session, and > the server would just be able to insert updated entries > anywhere it chooses to in the outgoing data stream. I would argue that the lack of sequence is annoying for consumers with complex data models and as LDAP gains market share, such models become more and more frequent. These LCUP clients would have to sort and hold data until meaningful. Of course, I speak from the point of view if the client (trying to make my life easier ;-) but I'm sure that the server side has its own challenges. So, whatever the resolution will be, thanks for taking these issues into consideration. Mircea.