Re: LDUP WG Meeting Minutes
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 10:24 AM 2002-04-13, Chris Apple wrote: >11) LDUP Access Control Design Team > >The co-chair present at the WG meeting presented a status report on the >recently formed LDUP Access Control Design Team. Specifically, a terse >mission statement and proposed team work plan was presented to the WG. >There were some concerns expressed about the lack of any obvious status >reports into the WG being included explicitly in the work plan. There >were >also concerns raised about how far the proposed work plan goes down the >path >of allowing for the possibility of the current design team members >actually >creating specifications for access control in the context of LDAPv3 >replication. >A third area of concern was not having the design team membership >included >in the document presented during the WG meeting. The co-chair agreed to >do the >following to help alleviate these concerns: > > i) revise the design team's work plan to include explicit status > reports and inputs to the WG > ii) add a list of design team member names with e-mail addresses > to the work plan > iii) post the resulting document to the WG mailing list for > further discussion I noted that the LDUP WG is not yet chartered to do engineering work in the area of LDAP Access Controls and, hence, the WG's design team must limit its work (until such time a charter revision is approved) to making a recommendation on how to revise the charter. >12) WG Charter Bashing > >The room consensus was that the WG charter needs to be revised to >address: While I believe there is consensus that the LDUP WG charter needs to revised, I do not believe there is any consensus as to how the charter should be revised. In particular, I do not believe there is yet consensus on which items should or should not be added/modified/removed. No specific charter revision was proposed or discussed at the meeting. > + actual versus anticipated publication of revisions to WG >documents > + the formation of the LDUP Access Control Design Team > + the current dependency of the WG charter on the Access Control > deliverables of the soon-to-conclude LDAPEXT WG > + the LDAPv3 framing/grouping concept > + an administrative model for replication > + replication-relevant access control input from the > LDUP Access Control Design Team