Re: LCUP issue: Need for lcupReloadRequired
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 10:11 PM 2002-09-03, Jim Sermersheim wrote: >I suppose the benefit is that in the event entries have been deleted, or >are not in the result set anymore, this two-step process lets the client >know that it's current cache may be inconsistent with the entries in the >directory. IMO, an update protocol which doesn't ensure that at completion of the synchronization that there all inconsistencies can be detected and resolved, should be referred to as a "content synchronization protocol". Kurt