LCUP: collective attributes, subentries, etc.
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]> Wed, 04 Sep 2002 20:23:32 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Some statement should be made with how LCUP interacts with collective attributes appearing both in the filter and returned entries. The simple approach would be to say: 1) filter should not contain assertions upon collective attributes, 2) changes to an collective subentry will not cause entries within the collection to be "updated", 3) clients are interested in maintaining sync with collective attributes should include the collective subentry within an LCUP request. Which leads to my next question: how does a client ask for update of both entry and subentry DSEs subordinate to the baseObject object? This is similar to the subordinate referral issue. One could generalize the question to: How does a client ask for update of all DSEs of a particular combination of DSE types subordinate to the baseObject? Kurt