Re: LDAPv3 Replication Access Control Design Team Report
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Sep 2002 07:28:39 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 04:34 PM 2002-09-10, Richard Huber wrote: >If access controls are being used in a directory, the directory administrator has decided that it is important to >control access to all or part of the data in the tree. So if replication is used in a directory that has access >controls, there needs to be a way to make sure that those access controls are not lost because of replication. It not sufficient to just ensure access controls are not lost because of replication. http://www.imc.org/ietf-ldup/mail-archive/msg01261.html >A standard access control mechanism for all LDAP directories is one way to do this. A standard access control mechanism, by itself, is not sufficient. See above article. >But it can also be done by >making sure that the ACM in effect for any given part of the DIT is well defined, and that the definition can be >carried as part of the data being replicated. Likewise, a standard framework for non-standard ACMs, by itself, is not sufficient. Kurt