Re: Single-Master Failover Recovery and Automated Replication

Zachary Amsden wrote:

>Designing a
>recovery protocol that encompasses all of these options is a rather large
>problem, which is probably why it hasn't been formalized yet (at least not
>in a public forum).
>
Well, I'd argue that multi-master is the solution to the single-master 
recovery
problem... so a solution has been formalized in a public forum.

John