Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldup-lcup-04.txt

"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:15:28 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ldup
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Given the confusion over terminology, I suggest we start over.

Is it the authors intent to allow a "no-histories"-based server
implementation approach of this protocol?

A "no-histories" implementation approach is one where the server
does not maintain histories of directory or meta information changes
but instead relies on the current directory and meta information
and the "cookie".

It appears to me that server implementations would need
to maintain historical directory and meta information in
order to appropriately support this protocol.

Kurt