Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldup-lcup-04.txt
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:15:28 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ldup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Given the confusion over terminology, I suggest we start over. Is it the authors intent to allow a "no-histories"-based server implementation approach of this protocol? A "no-histories" implementation approach is one where the server does not maintain histories of directory or meta information changes but instead relies on the current directory and meta information and the "cookie". It appears to me that server implementations would need to maintain historical directory and meta information in order to appropriately support this protocol. Kurt