Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldup-lcup-04.txt

At 11:43 AM 3/10/2003, Rich Megginson wrote:
>It is definitely not the intention of the authors of LCUP that the server has to store any histories of content updates.
[...]
>A state based system can store historical state.  One of the assumptions of LCUP is that the server already has some sort of underlying historical information storage model, like a log or a state-based system with historical information.

How do you reconcile your statement that a server need not store
any histories with your statement that LCUP assumes an historical
information storage model?  They seem counter to each other.

>>I disagree.  Every technical specifications limit implementation
>>approaches to those which can produce conformant implementations.
>>However, standard track technical specifications should avoid
>>placing undue constraints on implementation details.
>Define "undue".

"inappropriate" or "improper".